# Aerospace Recruiting Agencies

Placing propulsion engineers, avionics specialists, and program managers building the next era of flight and space.

## At a glance

- **221** agencies ranked
- **98,399** total Google reviews
- Data last refreshed **February 21, 2026**

## Top 50 ranked agencies

| # | Agency | Rating (reviews) | Office locations |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [180 Engineering](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/180-engineering) | 4.8 (107) | Naperville |
| 2 | [CalTek Staffing](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/caltek-staffing) | 4.2 (9) | San Diego, San Jose |
| 3 | [Warriors Solutions Group](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/warriors-solutions-group) | 5.0 (427) | Ashburn |
| 4 | [OneCruit LLC](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/onecruit-llc) | 4.9 (956) | City of Industry, Ontario, Anaheim |
| 5 | [Spectrum Recruiting Solutions](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/spectrum-recruiting-solutions) | 4.9 (133) | Draper |
| 6 | [C](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/c-1) | 4.9 (82) | New York |
| 7 | [Partners Personnel](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/partners-personnel) | 4.9 (63,545) | Artesia, Santa Paula, Chula Vista |
| 8 | [Empire Skilled Trades Solutions](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/empire-skilled-trades-solutions) | 4.9 (68) | Garden Grove |
| 9 | [Beneficial Talent Source](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/beneficial-talent-source) | 4.9 (195) | Milford |
| 10 | [Quest Energy Group](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/quest-energy-group) | 4.8 (41) | Katy |
| 11 | [Tidewater Staffing](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/tidewater-staffing) | 4.8 (2,366) | Portsmouth, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake |
| 12 | [USPRO](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/uspro) | 4.8 (76) | Reno, Boston |
| 13 | [CapstoneONE Search](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/capstoneone-search) | 4.8 (67) | Maumee |
| 14 | [Onin Staffing](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/onin-staffing) | 4.8 (22,044) | Little Rock, Ridgeland, Kernersville |
| 15 | [PeopleSuite Talent Solutions](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/peoplesuite-talent-solutions) | 4.8 (59) | Mooresville |
| 16 | [Blue Signal](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/blue-signal) | 4.8 (53) | Phoenix |
| 17 | [RIGHTSTAFF](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/rightstaff) | 4.8 (264) | Collinsville |
| 18 | [Waterford Executive](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/waterford-executive) | 4.8 (44) | Mississauga |
| 19 | [Konnect Resources](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/konnect-resources) | 4.8 (35) | Brea |
| 20 | [Job Impulse Inc.](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/job-impulse-inc) | 4.7 (1,179) | Flint, Auburn Hills, Spartanburg |
| 21 | [TruFit Staffing](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/trufit-staffing) | 4.7 (98) | Fife, Tukwila |
| 22 | [All About Personnel](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/all-about-personnel) | 4.7 (71) | Hanover Park, Roselle |
| 23 | [Aplin](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/aplin) | 4.7 (14) | Ottawa |
| 24 | [Certified Creative Agency](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/certified-creative-agency) | 4.7 (14) | San Francisco, Emeryville |
| 25 | [Pinpoint Search Group](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/pinpoint-search-group) | 4.7 (13) | Grand Junction |
| 26 | [Saberus](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/saberus) | 4.7 (13) | Matthews |
| 27 | [Saige Partners - Your Future. Your Solution.](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/saige-partners-your-future-your-solution) | 4.7 (19) | Iowa City |
| 28 | [Blue Chip Staffing LLC](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/blue-chip-staffing-llc) | 4.7 (16) | New York |
| 29 | [Mindways Consultancy](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/mindways-consultancy) | 4.7 (15) | Mississauga |
| 30 | [The Structures Company, LLC](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/the-structures-company-llc) | 4.7 (105) | Seal Beach |
| 31 | [US Tech Solutions](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/us-tech-solutions) | 4.7 (505) | Rocklin, Jersey City |
| 32 | [Safe T Professionals, LLC](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/safe-t-professionals-llc) | 4.7 (9) | Chandler |
| 33 | [Motive Workforce](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/motive-workforce) | 4.6 (8) | Long Beach |
| 34 | [SEC Group](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/sec-group) | 4.6 (8) | Buford |
| 35 | [Sound Advice Recruiting Services](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/sound-advice-recruiting-services) | 4.6 (16) | Denver |
| 36 | [Redline Resources](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/redline-resources) | 4.6 (35) | Shelby Township |
| 37 | [The Source and Recruit Company](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/the-source-and-recruit-company) | 4.6 (7) | — |
| 38 | [Venus Consultancy Ltd](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/venus-consultancy-ltd) | 4.6 (28) | Scarborough |
| 39 | [TRS Craft Services](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/trs-craft-services) | 4.6 (317) | Greenville, Houston, Costa Mesa |
| 40 | [Corporate Navigators, LLC](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/corporate-navigators-llc) | 4.6 (6) | Chicago |
| 41 | [Dugan Staffing Solutions, Inc.](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/dugan-staffing-solutions-inc) | 4.6 (6) | — |
| 42 | [Moseley Technical Services Inc](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/moseley-technical-services-inc) | 4.6 (6) | Huntsville |
| 43 | [RML SPECIALTY GROUP](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/rml-specialty-group) | 4.6 (6) | — |
| 44 | [Employment Professionals Canada](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/employment-professionals-canada) | 4.6 (118) | Fort Erie, Thorold |
| 45 | [S&A Solutions, Inc.](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/sa-solutions-inc) | 4.6 (405) | Sterling Heights |
| 46 | [Averro](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/averro) | 4.6 (5) | Roseville |
| 47 | [Taylor Nicole Professionals](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/taylor-nicole-professionals) | 4.6 (5) | Anaheim |
| 48 | [Top Notch Personnel, Inc](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/top-notch-personnel-inc) | 4.6 (133) | Wichita |
| 49 | [Amtec](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/amtec) | 4.6 (78) | Chino Hills, Prescott |
| 50 | [RRC - Ruiz Recruiting & Consulting](https://recruiterrank.co/profile/rrc-ruiz-recruiting-consulting) | 4.6 (12) | Salt Lake City |

## How These Rankings Work

Scores come from **Google Reviews** via the Google Places API — never from paid placements, and never set by the agencies themselves. We apply a **Bayesian adjusted average** to prevent small-sample distortion (a 2-review 5.0-star agency shouldn't outrank a 200-review 4.8-star one):

```
adjusted_score = (v / (v + m)) * R + (m / (v + m)) * C
```

- `v` — total reviews across all offices
- `m` — prior weight (**20**)
- `R` — the agency's weighted average score
- `C` — the platform-wide mean

So with a global mean of 4.2: an agency with **5 reviews at 5.0** scores 4.36, while one with **200 reviews at 4.8** scores 4.75. The second outranks the first because the score is backed by more evidence.

Multi-office agencies get a single weighted score across locations. Every listing is human-reviewed before publication. Scores refresh hourly. [Read the full methodology →](https://recruiterrank.co/methodology)

## FAQ

### What's the difference between contingency and retained search for aerospace hiring?

Contingency firms earn a fee only when you hire their candidate, typically 20 to 25 percent of first-year salary. Multiple agencies often compete on the same role, and you control timing. Retained search involves an exclusive contract with upfront and milestone payments, regardless of outcome. It's reserved for senior roles like chief engineers or program directors requiring deep market mapping. For aerospace, contingency works well for propulsion engineers and avionics specialists with active clearances, while retained search suits executive hires where confidentiality and comprehensive competitor analysis justify the investment.

### What types of aerospace roles do these recruiting agencies typically fill?

These firms recruit across the full spectrum of aerospace disciplines: propulsion and combustion engineers, avionics and flight control specialists, structural and materials engineers, systems integration leads, and aerospace program managers. You'll also see placements for certification engineers navigating FAA and international airworthiness standards, supply chain managers handling complex multi-tier programs, and manufacturing engineers scaling production from prototype to rate. Defense-focused agencies additionally staff cleared positions in satellite systems, missile guidance and classified aircraft programs. Roles span commercial aviation, space launch, defense contractors and emerging urban air mobility ventures.

### What certifications or licenses do these aerospace recruiters typically screen for?

Aerospace recruiters screen for Professional Engineer (PE) licenses for structural and systems roles, FAA Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) certificates for maintenance positions, and Security+ or equivalent for cyber-physical systems work. They verify ITAR compliance eligibility and active security clearances—Secret and Top Secret/SCI for defense contracts. Program managers often need PMP or equivalent credentials. For avionics specialists, recruiters look for DO-178C software certification training and IPC-A-610 for electronics assembly. Propulsion engineers may hold AIAA membership and relevant ASQ certifications for quality roles supporting launch systems.

### What questions should I ask an aerospace recruiter before signing a contract?

Ask how many clearance-holding propulsion or avionics engineers they've placed in the past twelve months and request verifiable references from hiring managers in your program's phase—whether development, testing or production. Confirm their familiarity with ITAR compliance and your specific propulsion architecture or flight systems. Clarify fee structure, replacement guarantees and whether they maintain an active pipeline of passive candidates with current certifications. Request their average time-to-fill for roles requiring TS/SCI clearance and domain-specific experience in your propulsion type or avionic bus standard.

### How long does a typical aerospace search take from kickoff to hire?

Most aerospace searches span 60 to 90 days from intake to accepted offer. Propulsion engineers and avionics specialists with active clearances may close in 45 days if the talent pool is warm. Program managers overseeing multi-phase aircraft or satellite development often extend to 120 days given the layered technical and leadership vetting required. Agencies working with prime contractors report that clearance adjudication adds three to six weeks for roles requiring Secret or Top Secret access. Niche disciplines like hypersonics or electric propulsion systems routinely push timelines beyond 90 days when candidate supply is constrained.

### How do aerospace recruiters handle ITAR compliance and security clearance requirements during the hiring process?

Specialized aerospace recruiters pre-screen candidates for citizenship status and existing clearance levels before presenting them to clients. They maintain candidate databases segmented by clearance type—Confidential, Secret, Top Secret and TS/SCI—and understand timelines for adjudication. Experienced firms know which roles require interim clearances versus active ones, coordinate SF-86 submissions with hiring managers and ensure job descriptions specify ITAR restrictions. They also maintain secure communication protocols for handling sensitive candidate information and understand export control regulations that govern who can access technical data during interviews and onboarding.

## Explore

### Related industries

- [Manufacturing](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/manufacturing)
- [Engineering](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/engineering)
- [IT](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/it)
- [Finance](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/finance)
- [Defense](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/defense)
- [Automotive](https://recruiterrank.co/industry/automotive)

### Aerospace recruiters by city

- [Chicago, IL](https://recruiterrank.co/city/chicago-il) — 6 agencies
- [Irvine, CA](https://recruiterrank.co/city/irvine-ca) — 6 agencies
- [Denver, CO](https://recruiterrank.co/city/denver-co) — 4 agencies
- [Greenville, SC](https://recruiterrank.co/city/greenville-sc) — 4 agencies
- [Riverside, CA](https://recruiterrank.co/city/riverside-ca) — 4 agencies